Items | Valid | Mean | Std. Dev | Importance | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD | D | N | A | SA | |||||
The instructor was an effective lecturer | Freq | 1 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 5 | 3.61 | 0.855 | 72% |
% | 2.6 | 2.6 | 39.5 | 42.1 | 13.5 | Â | Â | Â | |
Presentations were clear and organized | Freq | 2 | 0 | 8 | 21 | 7 | 3.82 | 0.926 | 76% |
% | 5.2 | 0.0 | 21.1 | 55.3 | 18.4 | Â | Â | Â | |
The instructor could arouse student interest | Freq | 2 | 2 | 14 | 15 | 5 | 3.50 | 0.980 | 70% |
% | 5.3 | 5.3 | 36.8 | 39.5 | 13.2 | Â | Â | Â | |
The instructor could manage the time effectively during classes | Freq | 2 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 3.58 | 1.056 | 72% |
% | 5.3 | 5.3 | 36.8 | 31.6 | 21.1 | Â | Â | Â | |
The instructor was available and helpful | Freq | 3 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 7 | 3.74 | 1.032 | 75% |
% | 7.9 | 0.0 | 21.1 | 52.6 | 1.4 | Â | Â | Â | |
Grading was prompt and the instructor gave useful feedback | Freq | 2 | 3 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 3.53 | 1.006 | 71% |
% | 5.2 | 7.9 | 28.9 | 44.7 | 13.2 | Â | Â | Â | |
Adequate teaching materials were available as per the requirements of e-learning | Freq | 1 | 0 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 3.58 | 0.826 | 72% |
% | 2.6 | 0.0 | 47.6 | 36.8 | 13.2 | Â | Â | Â |