Skip to main content

Table 3 Transfer of language features and writing processes across academic writing settings

From: Assessing learning transfer and constraining issues in EAP writing practices

Language features and writing processes covered in GEAP course

Rate of Transfer to Academic Writing settings

Economics

Bio

Polit. Sc

Geography

Mechanical Engineering

Computer science

Use of Basic sentence structure

81%

µ = 13.67, P = .005)

86%

µ = 21.57, P = .003

83%

(µ = 13.67, P = .017)

77%

(µ = 2.55, P = .0385)

82%

(µ = 3.76, P = 0.002)

93%

(µ = 2.23, P = .002)

Use of Coordinating conjunctions

68%

(µ = 6.52, P = .026)

76%

(µ = 10.72, P = .016)

71%

(µ = 3.16, P = .028)

72%

(µ = 2.67, P = .0217)

52%

(µ = 9.57, P = .0385)

72%

(µ = 5.67, P < .0173)

Use of Correlatives

58%

(µ = 4.33, P = .0311)

62%

(µ = 3.42, P = .0298)

69%

(µ = 3.67, P = .0256)

61%

(µ = 5.67, P = .0301)

51%

(µ = 25.87, P = .0478)

52%

(µ = 4.24, P = 0.048)

Use of Adverbial conjunctions

57%

(µ = 4.73, P = .038)

65%

(µ = 4.56, P < .031)

67%

(µ = 3.89, P = .028)

61%

(µ = 5.67, P = .034)

51%

(µ = 25.87, P = .047)

52%

(µ = 4.24, P < 0.048)

Use of Subordinate conjunctions and appositives

76%

(µ = 25.17, P = .001)

80%

(µ = 56.76, P = .018)

78%

(µ = 31.89, P = 0.028)

82%

(µ = 2.11, P < 0.018)

76% (µ = 7.67, P = .021)

53%

(µ = 5.27, P = .042)

writing processes and strategies for disciplinary writing

13%

µ = 1.89, P = .81

14.5%

µ = 2.11, P = .78

14%

µ = 2.01, P = .81

12%

µ = 2.42, P = .87

13.5%

µ = 2.11; P = .78

11%

µ = 1.31; P = .88

Discourse types and structures in disciplinary writing

22%

µ = 2.22, P = .64

24%

µ = 2.31, P = .68

21%

µ = 2.21, P = .66

23%

µ = 2.23, P = .68

19%

µ = 2.01, P = .77

18%

µ = 1.96, P = .82

Vocabulary

22%

µ = 2.22; P = .65

22.5%

µ = 2.23, P = .66

21%

µ = 2.01, P = .68

18%

µ = 1.96; P = .74

16%

µ = 2.21; P = .75

12%

µ = 1.87, P = .76