Skip to main content

Table 10 Descriptive Statistics for the observation at the stage of post writing

From: The effect of structured versus unstructured collaborative pre-writing task on writing skills of the Iranian EFL students

Items

VM + M

A

*AL +* A

F

P

F

P

F

P

11. Motivating learners to evaluate each other’s writing through the process of error correction and peer feedback.

    

6

100%

12. Reassuring learners’ self-reflection on how well they wrote based on their initial plans and how well they corrected their errors through proofreading their own writing tasks.

  

3

50%

3

50%

13. Noticing the learners’ relevant needs for further learning.

6

100%

    

14.Encouraging connecting ideas to hand in a coherent piece of writing.

4

66.7%

2

33.3%

  

15. Inspiring monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of writing strategies and motivating transferring strategies to new tasks through providing learners with oral and written feedback.

3

50%

  

3

50%

  1. *VM: very much; *M: much; *AL: a little; *L: little.