Skip to main content

Table 6 Contingency Table for Metalinguistic WCF Duration and DMs Accuracy

From: Investigating metalinguistic written corrective feedback focused on EFL learners’ discourse markers accuracy in mobile-mediated context

Session

Additive

Adversative

Causal

Temporal

Total

1

Count

548

240

199

173

1160

% within Session

58.9%

12.7%

18.1%

10.3%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

3.5

−5.1

2.0

−1.5

 

2

Count

507

237

172

184

1100

% within Session

46.1%

21.5%

15.6%

16.7%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

−5.6

3.0

−.4

5.6

 

3

Count

521

271

170

178

1140

% within Session

47.4%

24.6%

15.5%

12.5%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

−4.7

5.8

−.6

1.0

 

4

Count

619

232

185

164

1200

% within Session

56.3%

21.1%

16.8%

5.8%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

1.6

2.6

.7

−6.4

 

5

Count

597

186

207

181

1171

% within Session

54.2%

16.9%

18.8%

10.1%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

−.1

−1.3

2.7

−1.7

 

6

Count

665

156

197

172

1190

% within Session

60.5%

14.2%

12.5%

12.9%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

4.6

−3.8

−3.5

1.4

 

7

Count

554

220

203

173

1150

% within Session

50.4%

20.0%

18.5%

11.2%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

−2.6

1.6

2.3

−.5

 

8

Count

640

167

138

168

1113

% within Session

58.6%

15.3%

12.6%

13.5%

100.0%

Adjusted Residual

3.2

−2.8

−3.3

2.1

 

Total

Count

4651

1709

1471

1393

9224

% within Session

54.0%

18.3%

16.0%

11.6%

100.0%