Sub-domain | Statement | User | Percentage (P) | M | SD | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SA | A | U | DA | SDA | |||||
Teaching/Learning Features | 1. The course entailed an active type of monitoring which allows students to frequently ask for help and advice. | St. | 3.64 | 9.67 | 10.43 | 55.53 | 20.73 | 2.20 | 0.99 |
Inst. | 14.81 | 22.22 | 3.70 | 38.89 | 20.37 | 2.72 | 1.41 | ||
2. The students’ errors received corrective feedback mainly in the form of recast. | St. | 13.94 | 31.41 | 23.11 | 22.99 | 8.54 | 3.19 | 1.19 | |
Inst. | 22.22 | 48.15 | 0 | 18.52 | 11.11 | 3.52 | 1.33 | ||
3. The course promoted both collaborative and individual task accomplishment. | St. | 18.09 | 31.15 | 9.55 | 28.77 | 12.44 | 3.14 | 1.30 | |
Inst. | 14.81 | 24.07 | 11.11 | 29.63 | 20.37 | 2.83 | 1.44 | ||
4. Throughout the course, the students received a combination of teacher and peer scaffolding. | St. | 20.10 | 30.02 | 1394 | 23.11 | 12.81 | 3.21 | 1.33 | |
Inst. | 31.48 | 31.48 | 0 | 31.48 | 5.56 | 3.52 | 1.37 | ||
Syllabus | 5. The course promoted a communicative task-based ESP teaching. | St. | 22.99 | 25.98 | 13.19 | 26.76 | 11.18 | 3.23 | 1.34 |
Inst. | 16.67 | 31.48 | 11.11 | 25.92 | 14.81 | 3.10 | 0.95 | ||
Materials | 6. The prescribed textbooks were accompanied by instances of technical language use in academic/working contexts. | St. | 11.56 | 35.30 | 18.34 | 24.25 | 10.55 | 3.13 | 1.21 |
Inst. | 14.81 | 18.52 | 7.41 | 27.78 | 31.48 | 2.57 | 1.47 | ||
7. The course mainly took advantage of textbook-derived tasks to reinforce the newly-learnt language. | St. | 35.55 | 49.50 | 6.53 | 4.77 | 3.64 | 4.08 | 1.01 | |
Inst. | 22.22 | 44.44 | 0 | 16.67 | 16.67 | 3.39 | 1.43 | ||
Administration | 8. The course was presented as a three-credit tertiary level course of three hours’ duration per week. | St. | 28.27 | 40.07 | 2.39 | 17.46 | 11.81 | 3.56 | 1.30 |
Inst. | 29.63 | 31.48 | 0 | 24.07 | 14.81 | 3.37 | 1.49 | ||
9. The instructor enjoyed an acceptable degree of English teaching and the subject-specific knowledge. | St. | 28.52 | 40.07 | 13.44 | 10.93 | 7.03 | 3.72 | 1.14 | |
Inst. | 31.48 | 38.89 | 20.37 | 9.26 | 0 | 3.93 | 0.92 | ||
10. The course was regarded as a tertiary level compulsory course. | St. | 33.42 | 19.35 | 2.76 | 19.60 | 24.87 | 3.17 | 1.64 | |
Inst. | 29.63 | 24.07 | 7.41 | 22.22 | 16.67 | 3.28 | 1.46 | ||
11. The course was administered taking advantage of modern educational facilities | St. | 1.51 | 7.79 | 4.90 | 36.31 | 49.50 | 1.84 | 1.11 | |
Inst. | 1.85 | 3.70 | 0 | 37.04 | 57.41 | 1.56 | 0.82 | ||
Assessment | 12. The students’ technical English learning was gauged using a combination of low- & high-stakes exams. | St. | 26.63 | 52.64 | 3.64 | 8.79 | 8.29 | 3.80 | 1.15 |
Inst. | 25.93 | 38.89 | 0 | 25.93 | 9.26 | 3.46 | 1.37 | ||
Total | St. | 19.14 | 29.16 | 11.49 | 23.99 | 16.22 | 3.11 | 1.29 | |
Inst. | 21.36 | 29.38 | 4.94 | 27.28 | 17.04 | 3.11 | 1.45 |