From: Utilizing an automated tool analysis to evaluate EFL students’ writing performances
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Nar1 | – | |||||||||
2. Nar2 | .227 | – | ||||||||
3. Syn1 | −.262 | −.111 | – | |||||||
4. Syn2 | −.156 | .029 | .614a | – | ||||||
5. WC1 | −.132 | .145 | −.144 | .066 | – | |||||
6. WC2 | −.004 | −.469a | .033 | .087 | .127 | – | ||||
7. RC1 | .656a | .274 | −.511a | −.167 | .005 | −.102 | – | |||
8. RC2 | .176 | .482a | −.411a | −.397a | .160 | −.209 | .444a | – | ||
9. DC1 | .099 | −.020 | .148 | −.105 | .114 | −.023 | −.159 | −.006 | – | |
10. DC2 | −.006 | .472a | .144 | .091 | .267 | −.286 | .032 | .300 | .076 | – |