Skip to main content

Table 8 Correlations between the components

From: Utilizing an automated tool analysis to evaluate EFL students’ writing performances

Variable

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1. Nar1

         

2. Nar2

.227

        

3. Syn1

−.262

−.111

       

4. Syn2

−.156

.029

.614a

      

5. WC1

−.132

.145

−.144

.066

     

6. WC2

−.004

−.469a

.033

.087

.127

    

7. RC1

.656a

.274

−.511a

−.167

.005

−.102

   

8. RC2

.176

.482a

−.411a

−.397a

.160

−.209

.444a

  

9. DC1

.099

−.020

.148

−.105

.114

−.023

−.159

−.006

 

10. DC2

−.006

.472a

.144

.091

.267

−.286

.032

.300

.076

  1. Note. 1 = writing task 1, 2 = writing task 2, Nar = Narrativity, Syn = Syntactic Simplicity, WC = Word Concreteness, RC = Referential Cohesion, DC = Deep Cohesion
  2. aCorrelation is significant at the .01 level (2-tailed)
  3. bCorrelation is significant at the .05 level (2-tailed)