Table 9 Descriptive Statistics for the observation at the stage of while-writing
Items | *VM +* M | *A | *Al +* A | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F | P | F | P | F | P | |
6. Considering students’ interest and providing opportunity for collaborative discussion in mutual interaction and monitoring group discussion through structured and unstructured tasks. | 3 | 50% | 3 | 50% |  |  |
7. Inspiring learners to rely on others’ ideas and to take responsibility for assessment and consider peer feedback through learners’ contribution to the process of the group work. | 4 | 66.7% |  |  | 2 | 33.3% |
8. Considering gap between students, learners’ ability for communication, time limit for task implementation and members’ unequal participation. | 1 | 16.7% | 1 | 16.7% | 4 | 66.7% |
9. Cultivating open communication and keeping students on target by specifying how learners deal with their writing issues. | 2 | 33.3% | 2 | 33.3% | 2 | 33.3% |
10. Removing the scaffolding phase by phase and encourage planning the content of the writing task. | 3 | 50% | 1 | 16.7% | 2 | 33.3% |