From: The effectiveness of L2 vocabulary instruction: a meta-analysis
Moderator | K | d | 95% CI | (Low, High) | Q |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Context | 3.026 | ||||
FL | 9 | 0.96 | 0.57 | 1.36 | |
SL | 7 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.81 | |
Age Group | 0.04 | ||||
> 12 | 13 | 0.79 | 0.46 | 1.11 | |
< 12 | 3 | 0.85 | 0.38 | 1.32 | |
Publication Type | 4.75 | ||||
Published | 7 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 1.46 | |
Dissertations | 9 | 1.12 | 0.20 | 0.93 | |
Proficiency Level | 2.23 | ||||
Elementary | 4 | 0.61 | 0.04 | 1.18 | |
Intermediate | 11 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 1.24 | |
Advanced | 1 | 0.53 | 0.18 | 0.88 | |
Word Type | 0.24 | ||||
Abstract | 7 | 0.92 | 0.73 | 1.10 | |
Concrete | 5 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.97 | |
NA | 4 | 0.72 | 0.46 | 0.98 | |
Technology Type | 7.05 | ||||
CALL | 7 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 0.88 | |
CALL | 1 | 1.37 | 0.58 | 2.15 | |
Reading | 5 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 1.50 | |
Song | 3 | 0.47 | 0.19 | 0.75 |